Back

Carabid beetle communities along a gradient of agroecological systems: disentangling the roles of pesticides and soil tillage

Boeraeve, F.; Noel, G.; Bortels, J.; Francis, F.; Desgain, M.; Sirami, C.; Vialatte, A.; Caro, G.; Dufrene, M.

2026-10-06 ecology
10.64898/2026.10.04.756545 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The potential of alternative agricultural systems, such as organic or conservation agriculture, for biodiversity restoration has been widely investigated. However, variability of practices within each of these two categories of agricultural system has rarely been accounted for. Furthermore, these systems have most often been studied separately, isolating either organic or conservation agriculture (itself often reduced to a soil tillage reduction), and rarely analyzing these systems side by side. This study attempts to disentangle these multiple interrelationships by sampling carabid beetles in a network of 48 commercial Belgian farms including organic agriculture (OA), conservation agriculture (CA), farms combining the two approaches (OCA) and farms applying conventional practices (CVA). In each farm, we sampled carabids using pitfall and emergence traps in one winter cereal field and collected a detailed description of crop management practices. We found that community composition was primarily structured by seasonality early in the season (March, April) followed by convergence (May, June) driven by the aggregation of the most dominant species. Based on agroecosystem classification, organic certification (i.e., the absence of synthetic pesticide use) exerted a twofold stronger effect than application of conservation agriculture principles (i.e., reduced or no soil tillage) on carabid beetle community composition. Notably, OCA supported carabid assemblages that were structurally distinct from those of CA and CVA. Furthermore, carabid communities associated with OA differed significantly in composition from those of CVA. Observed and estimated species richness were also significantly higher in OCA than in CA and CVA, while OA differed from CVA only for observed richness. Beyond differences among agricultural systems, community responses were associated with specific management practices, which explained nearly a quarter of the compositional variation with significant influence of the duration since organic conversion and the frequency of synthetic pesticide application. Carabid abundances were negatively affected by synthetic pesticides and moldboard ploughing, whereas richness was more strongly related to the time since conversion to OA, cover crops, and organic amendments. Overall, these results position synthetic inputs and time since conversion as the main filters over carabid communities. Our study highlights the importance of jointly considering system level analyses and detailed management practices to better understand the complex relationships between agricultural practices and carabid communities.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.