Back

Ab initio CryoEM maps minimizing preferred orientation problems in heterogeneous mixtures: ReconSIREN

Herreros, D.; Sorzano, C. O. S.; Carazo, J. M.

2026-10-10 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.10.03.756391 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cryo-Electron Microscopy (CryoEM) Single Particle Analysis (SPA) is pivotal for elucidating protein structures and their conformational dynamics. Several critical steps are required to obtain accurate maps. First, the \textit{ab initio} relative orientations and shifts between images must be determined. Second, the common issue of specimens presenting a preferred orientation should be adequately addressed. Third, all of the above must account for particle flexibility and sample heterogeneity. Additionally, these steps are interrelated, making the search for all these parameters a real challenge when considering convergence robustness. In this context, we present ReconSIREN, a novel deep learning framework that addresses the key steps outlined before in an \textit{ab initio} manner while greatly minimizing one of the most important practical burdens in SPA, namely the errors introduced in the CryoEM maps by the existence of preferred orientations; the latter is achieved by a change of the optimization approach that avoids the so-called ``attraction problem'', and by the introduction of a new type of geometrical priors. It does so fully \textit{ab initio}, using deep learning training/inference steps without resorting to more traditional optimization approaches, and generating highly accurate initial reconstructions. We present maps as both homogeneous (consensus) maps and a full conformational landscape for analyzing flexibility and heterogeneity. Thanks to its Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture, ReconSIREN distributes the estimation workload across independent experts, improving optimization efficiency and simplifying the process.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.