Successor representation supports structural learning of syllable sequences
Liu, J.; Wang, Y.; Feng, J.; Zhao, H.; He, Q.; Yang, X.; Liang, B.
Show abstract
Humans efficiently learn the temporal structure of speech, yet the underlying cognitive mechanisms remain unclear. Recent research in visuospatial sequential memory has proposed the successor representation (SR), important in reinforcement learning, which encodes multi-step transitional relationships. To test whether SR also supports the structural learning of rapidly changing speech syllable sequences, we adapted a pyramid-structured sequential learning paradigm using syllable streams presented at a natural speech rate (~ 4 Hz). Participants exhibited robust structural learning, evidenced by asymmetric memory performance modulated by adjacent transitional probabilities. Notably, the SR model captured recognition performance for non-adjacent syllable pairs. Moreover, SR-based learning effects generalized across all syllable sequences, regardless of adjacency. Furthermore, the effectiveness of SR learning was associated with cognitive flexibility and working memory capacity. Together, these findings suggest that humans rely on effortful SR-like mechanisms for the structural learning of syllable sequences, highlighting a modality-general computational principle for sequential learning across various temporal modulation scales.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Long-term implicit memory for sequential auditory patterns in humans 94%
- Stimulus dependencies---rather than next-word prediction---can explain pre-onset brain encoding during natural listening 94%
- Humans parsimoniously represent auditory sequences by pruning and completing the underlying network structure 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.