Back

Retinotopic organization of head-orienting vectors in the pigeon ventral lateral geniculate nucleus

Severin, D.; Reynaert, B.; Vega-Zuniga, T.; Letelier, J. C.; Marin, G.; Karten, H. J.; Mpodozis, J.

2026-10-08 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.10.03.756353 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The ventral lateral geniculate nucleus (GLv) is a conserved retinorecipient structure positioned between visual and premotor systems, yet its role in visuomotor transformations remains poorly understood. Here, we examined whether the pigeon GLv contains a spatially organized motor representation linking visual-field locations to orienting movements. Anatomical tracing identified descending projections from neurons in the GLv inner lamina (GLv-li) through pretectal and tegmental regions toward pontine targets. GLv-li projection neurons are GABAergic, yet electrical microstimulation of GLv-li in awake pigeons evoked rapid head movements followed by smaller eye movements. Each stimulation locus produced a reproducible characteristic motor vector whose direction and duration were largely insensitive to stimulation parameters, whereas movement amplitude and velocity approached site-specific plateaus. Movements initiated from different head positions were better explained by repetition of a fixed displacement than by convergence toward a common spatial goal. Critically, motor-vector direction was systematically related to the direction of the visual receptive field represented at the same GLv locus, while motor-vector amplitude covaried with receptive-field eccentricity. These defining features persisted after optic tectum ablation. Together, these findings reveal a retinotopically-organized map of fixed-vector head movements in the avian GLv and identify a tectum-independent route through which visual spatial representations can access descending orienting circuitry.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.