Back

A Unified and Interpretable Geometric Optimization Framework for Intelligent Automated Implant Planning in CBCT from Single to Consecutive Multiple Missing Teeth

Zeng, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Li, J.; Cao, H.; Lu, Y.; Zhu, H.; Xiong, J.; Tang, Z.; Hu, N.; Ma, H.

2026-10-05 dentistry and oral medicine
10.64898/2026.10.03.26364640 medRxiv
Show abstract

Automated dental implant planning using artificial intelligence (AI) faces challenges in interpretability, safety assurance, and applicability beyond single-tooth cases. This paper presents a unified explainable framework for cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) that handles both single-tooth and consecutive multiple missing teeth. The method combines nnU-Net-based anatomical segmentation with a transparent geometric optimization pipeline. Implant placement is formulated as a lexicographic multi-objective constrained optimization problem that enforces clinical safety margins while balancing bone engagement, mesiodistal spacing, and buccolingual position. For multi-tooth cases, a global coordination strategy ensures inter-implant parallelism, minimum spacing, and a common insertion path. The framework was validated on 20 single-tooth and 9 consecutive multi-tooth cases. The AI plans achieved a centroid distance of 1.60+/-1.05 mm for single-tooth cases and 1.22+/-0.32 mm for multi-tooth cases, with approximately 7 degrees axial angle difference. All plans achieved 100% compliance with predefined safety thresholds. In a Turing-style test, experts were unable to distinguish AI from human intelligence (HI) plans under blinded conditions. By decoupling perception from reasoning and embedding clinical knowledge as explicit constraints, the framework offers an interpretable and clinically trustworthy solution for computer-aided implant dentistry.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.