Back

PIE: Generalizing perturbation effects across unseen perturbations, contexts and datasets

Verma, R.; Adduri, A.; Bevilacqua, B.; Eraslan, B.; Burke, D.; Goodarzi, H.; Roohani, Y.

2026-10-05 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.10.02.756297 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Predicting cellular response to perturbations is key to understanding biological mechanisms and selecting therapeutic targets. However, generalizing across cellular contexts, perturbations, and experimental datasets remains challenging due to incomplete representations of the system being perturbed and the difficulty of measuring true perturbation effects within that system. We introduce PIE, a model that addresses these limitations by reformulating the learning task around population level perturbation effects and incorporating auxiliary inputs that better characterize the biological system. PIE directly predicts differentially expressed genes and changes in gene expression for each (context, perturbation) pair, using external biological knowledge, baseline gene expression, and observed perturbation responses. Its architecture accommodates input sources with variable feature sets and predicts effects on genes seen and unseen during training. On the Replogle Nadig dataset, PIE achieves state of the art performance on most metrics across all tested generalization settings, including the most challenging setting where both the context and perturbation are unseen during training. For predicting differentially expressed genes, PIE achieves 1.2 to 3.2 times the AUPRC of the strongest baseline in each setting: across unseen contexts, perturbations, experimental datasets, and jointly unseen contexts and perturbations. Overall, PIE provides a framework for generalizing perturbation effects across diverse experimental conditions.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.