Back

Single-Acquisition Spectral and Ultra-High-Resolution Pediatric Head CT: Phantom Comparison of Deep-Silicon Photon-Counting and Energy-Integrating Detectors

Feemster, S. G.; Rashidi, A.; Azimi, N.; Yin, Z.; Cherkezyan, L.; Yue, M.; Nett, B. E.; Pourmorteza, A.

2026-10-05 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.10.02.26364533 medRxiv
Show abstract

Deep-silicon photon-counting CT uses a detector architecture distinct from cadmium-telluride systems and has not been evaluated for pediatric head imaging. To compare attenuation-dependent performance of deep-silicon photon-counting CT (dSi-PCCT) with energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT) and assess spectral and ultra-high-resolution (UHR) reconstructions from one acquisition. Graded-thickness cranial attenuator and pediatric head phantoms were scanned at a matched target volume CT dose index of 18 mGy. dSi-PCCT used 120 kVp and generated 50-, 65-, and 100-keV images; EID-CT used 80 and 100 kVp. We measured CT-number bias, noise, contrast, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) across 0--9 mm of nominal skull thickness. Mixed-effects models assessed imaging-condition effects. We compared matched standard-resolution and UHR temporal-bone images and generated calcium- and water-density maps from the same dSi-PCCT scan. Noise increased by 4.54%, 3.07%, and 1.35% per millimeter at 50, 65, and 100 keV, respectively, versus 8.38% and 7.84% at 80 and 100 kVp. Corresponding CNR decreases were 4.17%, 3.25%, and 1.75% versus 8.94% and 8.54% (interaction {rho} < 0.001). Changes in absolute CT-number bias and contrast did not differ among conditions ({rho} = 0.92 and {rho} = 0.59). In the pediatric head phantom, model-estimated 50-keV CNR ratios were 1.299 (95% CI, 1.163--1.452) versus 80 kVp and 1.424 (95% CI, 1.275--1.592) versus 100 kVp. Across three temporal-bone edges, UHR transition widths were 58.6%-61.9% narrower than standard-resolution widths. dSi-PCCT maintained CNR more consistently as nominal skull thickness increased and provided complementary spectral and UHR pediatric head images from one acquisition.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.