Intra-Patient Comparison of a Minimally Invasive Lid Treatment and Traditional Blepharoplasty: Patient and Surgeon-Reported Outcomes

Abstract Purpose: To use a minimally invasive lid treatment (MILT) utilizing Compressive Skin Contouring (CoCo) technology to compare patient- and surgeon-reported ecchymosis, edema, and incision appearance following MILT and traditional upper eyelid blepharoplasty (tBULB). Methods: Prospective, single-surgeon intra-patient study comparing MILT and tBULB in patients seen for bilateral blepharoplasty. Patients and the operating surgeon rated MILT and tBULB outcomes post-operatively on the day of surgery (T1) and at 2 months (T2) using surveys. Patient photographs taken 3 and 9 days post-operatively were blindly assessed by 3 independent surgeons to compare ecchymosis, edema, and incision appearance on the MILT and tBULB sides. Results: Seven patients participated in the study. At T1, 6/7 patients reported [&le;] ecchymosis and edema, and all patients reported better or equivalent incision appearance on the MILT side compared to the tBULB side. At T2, 6/7 of patients reported [&le;] edema; 4/7 reported < ecchymosis and better incision appearance on the MILT side. The surgeon reported < ecchymosis and [&le;] edema for 7/7 patients and better or equivalent incision appearance for 6/7 patients at T1; [&le;] ecchymosis and better or equivalent incision appearance for 7/7 and [&le;] edema for 6/7 patients at T2 on the MILT side. In the blinded evaluation, mean ecchymosis scores were lower, edema scores were lower or equivalent, and incision appearance was better for MILT vs. tBULB at days 3 and 9. Conclusions: In this intra-patient study, MILT outcomes compared favorably with tBULB, especially for ecchymosis and edema; two important aesthetic measures of patient perception.