Back

Transient 5-azacytidine exposure elicits persistent myogenic-like transcriptional remodeling in zebrafish fibroblasts: implications for cultivated seafood

Ikeda, D.; Mizusawaa, N.; Watabe, S.

2026-10-05 cell biology
10.64898/2026.10.01.756133 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Fibroblasts are readily obtained and expanded and may provide an alternative cell source for cultivated seafood if their latent myogenic potential can be accessed. We examined whether transient exposure to 5-azacytidine (AZA), a cytidine analogue known to convert mouse embryonic fibroblasts into myoblasts, elicits a persistent muscle gene program in embryo-derived zebrafish (Danio rerio) Z3 fibroblasts. Cells were exposed to 0, 2.5, 5 or 10 M AZA for 48 h and maintained in drug-free medium for 3 weeks. RNA-seq identified 744 genes that increased and 670 that decreased consistently across the concentration series. Increased genes encompassed myogenic regulators, fusion factors, sarcomeric components and excitation-contraction machinery, whereas decreased genes were enriched for extracellular-matrix and adhesion functions. In a separate six-dose RT-qPCR experiment (0-20 M AZA) with three biological replicates per concentration, all 19 selected muscle genes were significantly increased at 1.25 M, the lowest concentration tested, whereas 9 of 12 extracellular-matrix/fibroblast genes were significantly decreased. Several muscle genes plateaued or declined at higher concentrations, and multinucleated myotubes were not observed. A separate 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (decitabine) series showed a comparable muscle-associated response at 0.25 M. These findings indicate that zebrafish fibroblasts retain access to a myogenic-like transcriptional program, and they provide a model for identifying food-compatible approaches to control fish-cell lineage plasticity for cultivated seafood.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.