Back

Forest-weighted causal correlation: A scalable framework for causal inference in ecological time series

Kishi, S.

2026-10-08 ecology
10.64898/2026.10.01.756118 bioRxiv
Show abstract

1. Detecting causal relationships from ecological time series remains challenging because community dynamics are often nonlinear, high-dimensional, noisy, and strongly synchronized. These characteristics can reduce the reliability of existing causal inference methods and complicate the identification of ecological interactions in complex natural systems. 2. I introduce Forest-weighted Causal Correlation (FORCC), a machine-learning-based framework that infers directional causality from adaptive neighborhood structures learned by random forests. Rather than evaluating causal direction through cross-map reconstruction, FORCC quantifies directional dependence from the preservation of neighborhood structure using rank-based associations among forest-weight matrices. 3. Simulations of coupled nonlinear systems showed that FORCC accurately recovered causal direction while substantially reducing synchronization-induced false-positive detections relative to conventional convergent cross mapping. Chatterjee's {xi} exhibited the strongest resistance to synchronization-induced errors among the evaluated rank-based statistics. 4. Application to a 12-year marine community time series from Maizuru Bay, Japan, identified asymmetric relationships between individual taxa and community dynamics, revealing candidate driver-like and passenger-like roles that were not readily explained by seasonal synchrony alone. 5. By combining adaptive neighborhood learning with rank-based causal inference, FORCC provides a scalable framework for causal discovery in ecological time series. The method offers a practical tool for screening causal relationships, generating ecological hypotheses, and investigating complex interactions in multivariate natural systems.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.