Back

Scale- and genotype-dependent spatial concordance of Mycobacterium bovis in cattle and badgers

Akhmetova, A.; Salvador, L. C. M.; Oravcova, K.; Presho, E.; McComick, C.; Thompson, S.; Wright, L.; Menzies, F.; Trimble, N.; Harwood, R.; Kao, R. R.; Allen, A.; Pepler, T.; Skuce, R.

2026-10-05 ecology
10.64898/2026.10.01.756065 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Mycobacterium bovis causes tuberculosis (TB) in cattle, badgers (Meles meles), other wildlife, and humans, posing major animal and public health challenges in Britain and Ireland. Shared genotypes between cattle and badgers have been reported at regional scales, but whether this concordance holds at finer spatial scales, where control interventions operate, and whether it varies by genotype combination, remains unknown. Resolving this is critical for interpreting cross-species transmission risk and designing targeted control measures. We analyzed 1,248 M. bovis isolates from cattle and badgers (Northern Ireland, 1986-2018), including samples from a small, densely sampled intervention research area, using Multi-Locus Variable Number of Tandem Repeats Analysis (MLVA) and kernel discriminant analysis (KDA) across multiple spatial scales (25-95% density contours). We identified 36 MLVA types with four shared between species and one (MLV06) endemic to the area. Spatial concordance varied by type combination and scale: MLVA004-MLVA297 showed strong, bidirectional, scale-robust concordance; MLVA006-MLVA297 was concordant only at fine spatial scales; MLVA004-MLVA006 showed weak, asymmetric concordance; and no concordance was detected when all three types were analysed together. Our findings reveal spatial concordance between shared M. bovis genotypes varied by genotype combination and scale, indicating genotype-specific dynamics within this multi-host system.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.