Back

Piloting floral-visitor assemblages: Camera-based monitoring in the cliff-dwelling Eastern Alpine endemic Physoplexis comosa (Campanulaceae)

Iberl, K.; Kirschner, P.; Koc, A.; Hasakova, T.; Wellstein, C.; Stenc, J.

2026-10-02 ecology
10.64898/2026.10.01.756015 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding floral visitor dynamics along elevational gradients is essential for assessing potential implications for pollen limitation and population genetic processes in fragmented populations of cliff-dwelling alpine endemics. Physoplexis comosa (Campanulaceae) is a chasmophytic paleoendemic restricted to vertical rock faces on dolomitic and limestone bedrock from 200 to 2,800 m a.s.l. The species exhibits a specific floral morphology with fused corolla apices, basal openings for nectar access, and secondary pollen presentation, yet its functional floral visitor assemblage has remained poorly characterized across the species' elevational range. In this pilot study, we tested a two-tier camera-monitoring setup combining action cameras for diurnal monitoring with Raspberry Pi-based systems equipped with IR illumination for combined diurnal and nocturnal recording. We conducted monitoring across five elevational sites (1,480 to 2,400 m a.s.l.) in the Eastern Alps. Recorded video material was downsampled and annotated using the Addax platform alongside manual cross-validation to record physical contact events. Preliminary results confirm the technical feasibility of continuous monitoring in steep terrain and suggest possible elevational variation in diurnal visitors, alongside nocturnal activity by Geometridae moths. Camera-based observations provided higher functional resolution and revealed a different visitor assemblage than previous eDNA metabarcoding trials. This proof-of-concept establishes a methodological foundation for forthcoming multi-day monitoring campaigns and complements ongoing studies of the mating system and population-genetic analyses.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.