Back

Olfactory-mediated host tracking and rapid local adaptation in a seed-feeding wasp

Chen, X.; Zhang, Y. M.; Kuang, J.; Wang, Y.; Li, J.; Hu, W.; Yang, S.; Wang, W.; Lv, H.; Li, T.; Stone, G. N.; Mao, K.

2026-10-01 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.10.01.755887 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding how specialized herbivores track divergence among their hosts is central to evolutionary biology. Congruent genetic structure between hosts and herbivores is often interpreted as evidence of long-term codivergence, but similar patterns may also arise when herbivores rapidly adapt to pre-existing host differentiation. Here, we integrate population genomics, host volatile profiling, and behavioral assays to examine host-associated divergence in the obligate seed-feeding wasp Megastigmus daduheensis and its conifer host Cupressus chengiana across three river valleys on the eastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Despite strong phylogeographic congruence between each of the three wasp and host lineages, calibrated demographic analyses indicate that wasp divergence occurred during the early Holocene, substantially later than the Pliocene-Pleistocene divergence of host lineages. This temporal mismatch is inconsistent with strict long-term codivergence and instead supports rapid host tracking in a topographic complex region. Host lineages differed in volatile organic compound profiles, and behavioral assays showed that wasps were preferentially attracted to volatiles from their local host lineages. These results identify olfactory-mediated host recognition as a plausible mechanism promoting host fidelity and reinforcing host-associated genomic and behavioral differentiation. Our findings show that apparently concordant host-herbivore divergence can emerge over compressed evolutionary timescales through rapid local adaptation, highlighting how ecological differentiation can accumulate within species through host tracking.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.