A dynamical attractor computes reward prediction in the basal forebrain
Liu, H.-C.; Lin, S.-C.
Show abstract
Phasic ensemble bursting in subcortical neuromodulatory systems such as the basal forebrain (BF) provides a powerful format for broadcasting reward-prediction signals. These bursts encode reward prediction by varying population amplitude, yet their internal structure, reflected in cell-to-cell amplitude relationships, remains conserved. How neural circuits reconcile these competing constraints remains unknown. Here we show that BF bursting is generated by a dynamical attractor: burst structure is imposed not by feedforward inputs but by recurrent circuit dynamics, while burst amplitude is determined by approximately linear integration across concurrent inputs. Optogenetic activation of BF neurons expressing natriuretic peptide receptor 3 (Npr3) outside the behavioral task reproduced the low-dimensional dynamics of natural cue-evoked bursting, preserving the temporal envelope and cell-to-cell amplitude relationships across stimulation patterns. Critically, unilateral activation of non-overlapping Npr3 populations in either hemisphere recruited the full bilateral ensemble into the same native trajectory, showing that restricted inputs can nevertheless recruit the full ensemble. Matched ipsilateral and contralateral onset latencies exceeding 25 ms implicated recurrent interactions beyond the BF. Despite the conserved structure, population burst amplitude varied with stimulation strength and summed approximately linearly across concurrent unilateral inputs. This linear summation extended to natural sensory input during behavior: adding Npr3 stimulation to auditory cues increased cue-evoked burst amplitude, improved detection, and reduced subsequent reward responses, consistent with stronger reward prediction producing smaller reward prediction errors. Thus, a low-dimensional dynamical attractor preserves a shared BF burst structure across diverse inputs while integrating concurrent inputs into a scalar burst amplitude that encodes reward prediction.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Canonical decision computations underlie behavioral and neural signatures of cooperation in primates 96%
- Inhibitory and excitatory populations in parietal cortex are equally selective for decision outcome in both novices and experts 96%
- Thalamus drives two complementary input strata of the neocortex in parallel 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Spatially-local inhibition and synaptic plasticity together enable dynamic, context-dependent integration of parallel sensory pathways 96%
- Behavioral state and stimulus strength regulate the role of somatostatin interneurons in stabilizing network activity 95%
- Modulation of adult-born neuron excitability by coupling to GABAergic networks 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.