Back

Population-Based Prevalence of Overweight and Obesity in German Youth: Findings from MoMo 2.0 and Comparison with KiGGS

Lazarides, C.; Kuhnert, R.; Schienkiewitz, A.; Tschuschke, L.; Klos, L.; Fiedler, J.; Wolbring, L.; Hanssen-Doose, A.; Volk, C.; Niessner, C.; Loss, J.; Voelkle, M. C.; Woll, A.

2026-10-02 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.10.01.26364513 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objective: Overweight and obesity in childhood and adolescence are major risk factors for health problems across the lifespan. This manuscript reports the current prevalence of overweight and obesity among children and adolescents aged 4-17years living in Germany and compares them with previous population-based results. Methods: A representative, cross-sectional sample of 4-17-year-olds was drawn following a multistage sampling process. Analyses are based on weight and height of 3,978 individuals measured in the field by trained test instructors between 2023-2025. Overweight and obesity classification was defined using age- and sex-specific body-mass-index percentiles. To allow for comparability of prevalence estimates derived from previous assessment waves and other panel studies dating back to 2005, an alignment factor was derived using an inverse probability of participation weighting approach. Together with sampling weights, the alignment factor was applied to obtain current, representative prevalence estimates of overweight and obesity. Results: The aligned, weighted prevalence of overweight and obesity was 16.1% (95%CI[14.5-17.9%]), whereas prevalence of obesity was 6.7% (95%CI [5.5-8.1%]). Age- and sex-specific prevalence rates are reported and compared to previous waves. Conclusions: The current prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adolescents aged 4-17 years living in Germany remains stable over the past two decades.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.