Back

Multi-scale Transcriptional Characterization of HPV16 and HPV18 in Cervical Cancer: Host Pathway Alterations and Links With Viral Gene Expression Programs

Ishihara, M. A.; M. Moro Valeriano, M.; Oliveira, N.; Mamede, I.; Cavalcanti de Morais Gama, L.; Ferreira Cunha, A.; Maia Santos de Castro, I.; Vasquez, F.; Nishiyama-Jr, M. Y.; Setubal, J. C.; de Arruda Neto, E.; Chammas, R.; Nakaya, H. I.

2026-10-02 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.09.30.755713 bioRxiv
Show abstract

High-risk HPV is central to cervical carcinogenesis, but whether individual genotypes drive distinct tumor biology or converge on a shared oncogenic state remains unclear. Profiling viral and host gene expression across two independent cohorts (n = 93; 76 HPV16, 17 HPV18), we show that HPV16- and HPV18-associated cervical cancers differ in host transcriptional programs. A 55-gene signature discriminated the two genotypes, and 293 genes were concordantly differentially expressed across cohorts. Pathway and transcription-factor activity inference organized these differences along genotype-specific axes: HPV16 tumors were enriched for epithelial polarity and RTK-RAS-MAPK signatures, with elevated inferred CDX2 regulon activity, a transcription factor not normally active in cervical epithelium, suggesting an aberrant lineage-identity program not previously linked to this genotype. HPV18 tumors instead showed metabolic reprogramming and inflammatory signaling (STAT3, HIF1A), alongside reduced CASP8 and increased FDX1 expression, a pattern consistent with sensitization to immunogenic cell death. Both genotypes also organized along a continuum of early-to-late viral gene expression correlating with distinct host pathways: extracellular-matrix and translation-related in HPV16, interferon/antiviral and cell-cycle/mitochondrial in HPV18, indicating that viral transcriptional state associates with host biology beyond genotype alone. These results point to candidate genotype-specific vulnerabilities that merit functional validation.

Matching journals

The top 13 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.