Back

CryoCodex: learning discrete structural representations for cryo-EM map post-processing

Cheng, B.; Su, B.; Yang, J.

2026-10-08 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.09.30.755675 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cryo-EM maps frequently suffer from weak structural signals, spatially variable quality, and noise, complicating interpretation and downstream modeling. Existing post-processing approaches treat density enhancement, quality assessment, and masking as separate tasks, often amplifying residual noise or introducing local artifacts. Here, we present CryoCodex, a unified framework that jointly performs density enhancement, local quality estimation, and molecular masking. CryoCodex introduces a multi-head, multi-scale vector-quantization module that projects encoder-derived latent features onto a shared codebook of structural prototypes. By imposing discrete constraints across feature subspaces and spatial scales, the codebook suppresses stochastic noise while preserving recurrent structural patterns. On a non-redundant test set of 126 experimental maps spanning 3-8 [A], CryoCodex outperformed four representative methods, achieving a mean map-model FSC-0.5 of 3.93 [A] versus 4.62 [A] for EMReady2 and 6.87 [A] for the deposited maps. Downstream automated de novo model building with Phenix further confirmed the quality of the CryoCodex-enhanced maps. These gains extended to maps containing nucleic acids, where CryoCodex produced the best map-model agreement and improved model building. Half-map cross-validation indicated that these improvements are anchored to experimental data rather than driven by half-map-specific noise or structural hallucination. CryoCodex also delivered reliable local quality estimates and molecular masks within the same framework. Together, these results establish CryoCodex as a practical tool for cryo-EM map post-processing and structural determination in challenging cases.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.