Wavelet Transform Coherence Under Controlled Temporal Correspondence and Social Co-Presence: Implications for fNIRS Hyperscanning
Carollo, A.; Soffner, F.; Esposito, G.; Bizzego, A.
Show abstract
Interpersonal neural synchrony research using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) frequently relies on wavelet transform coherence (WTC) to quantify temporal correspondence between cortical signals. Yet, whether WTC reliably recovers experimentally defined differences in signal correspondence remains insufficiently established. Here, we evaluated WTC using an auditory-guided finger-tapping paradigm in which matching and non-matching temporal structures were compared within participants and between dyad members during individual and joint performance. Task-evoked analyses confirmed reliable recruitment of contralateral motor and premotor regions across both contexts, whereas the ipsilateral motor cortex was significantly recruited only during joint performance and was the only region differing between sessions. WTC sensitivity was strongly modulated by social co-presence. Within participants, WTC failed to discriminate matching from non-matching temporal structures during individual performance, whereas robust matching-related increases emerged during joint performance, particularly in contralateral motor and premotor regions. Between participants, WTC showed limited and region-specific discrimination when participants were tested separately, but higher coherence for matching temporal structures emerged during joint performance, particularly in motor regions. These findings show that WTC can recover experimentally defined temporal correspondence between fNIRS signals, but that this sensitivity is not context-independent. The within-participant results further suggest that social co-presence may alter the temporal dynamics of the individual neural signals themselves. WTC should therefore be interpreted as a context-sensitive measure whose meaning depends on the functional and social processes generating the signals being compared.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Theta activity discriminates high-level, species-specific body processes 92%
- Tracing the neural trajectories of evidence accumulation and motor preparation processes during voluntary decisions 92%
- All spectral frequencies of neural activity reveal semantic representation in the human anterior ventral temporal cortex 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Global Neural Oscillations Underlie Performance Variability and Attentional State Fluctuations in Humans 94%
- Temporal kinetics of brain state effects on visual perception 93%
- Predicting the subjective intensity of imagined sensory experiences from electrophysiological measures of oscillatory brain activity. 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Human Dynamic Clamp reveals the fronto-parietal network linking real-time social coordination and cognition 93%
- Dissociable neural information dynamics of perceptual integration and differentiation during bistable perception 93%
- Resting state fluctuations underlie free and creative verbal behaviors in the human brain 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Alpha/beta power decreases track the fidelity of stimulus-specific information 94%
- Modulation of aperiodic EEG activity provides sensitive index of cognitive state changes during working memory task 93%
- Cortical tracking of hierarchical rhythms orchestrates the multisensory processing of biological motion 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.