Wireless Monitoring of Patients Admitted to Hospital Wards: A Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial (i-PROTECT Trial): Clinical Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Arabi, Y.; Alsaawi, A.; Al Debasi, T.; Al Khathaami, A.; Almajed, K.; Al-Dorzi, H. M.; Tashkandi, N.; Al Hazme, R.; Matroud, A.; Caswell, A.; Ardah, H. I.; Groenbaek, K. K.; Al Ayadhi, N.; Alatassi, A.; Aldekhyl, S. S.; Alqahtani, S. Y.; Al-Qahtani, S.; Al Rashid, A.; Yousef, Z.; Alhadab, A.; Alotaibi, R.; Molala, W.; Alrashidi, M. S. K.; Alotaibi, M. M.; Alenazi, G. H.; Alotaibi, R.; Yadav, B.; Sadat, M.; Alshurman, K.; Al Enezi, A.; Al Rassamah, W.; Al Shuail, A. S.; Abdulaal, A.; Al-Dawood, A.
Show abstract
Introduction: Clinical deterioration in patients admitted to hospital wards is a major cause of preventable morbidity and mortality and is frequently preceded by abnormalities in vital signs that occur hours before serious adverse events occur. Early identification of patients at risk provides an opportunity for timely intervention before irreversible organ dysfunction develops. The objective of this trial is to evaluate whether implementing a wireless patient monitoring system reduces mortality and cardiopulmonary failure in patients admitted to hospital wards. Methods and analysis: The i-PROTECT trial is designed as a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial. Hospital wards (total of 28 wards, constituting clusters in this design) are randomized to have wireless monitoring for selected high-risk patients, 7 wards at a time, with every 7 wards constituting a sequence. In the first period, all wards will have no wireless monitoring. After a baseline period of 2 (+1 transition) months, the intervention is implemented in a randomly selected new sequence every 3-month period until the intervention is implemented in all sequences. The control group will receive usual care with standard intermittent monitoring and no wireless monitoring. The calculated sample size is 13160 patients. The primary endpoint is cardiopulmonary failure; a composite endpoint of 30-day in-hospital mortality, cardiac arrest, and need for vasopressor or intubation. The trial started on Feb 1, 2026, and is expected to complete patient follow-up by the end of May 2027. Ethics and dissemination: The trial was approved by the Institutional review board (IRB) of Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs (IRB/2623/23). The results will be presented at relevant national and international critical care conferences and published in international peer-reviewed journals.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Electronic early notification of sepsis in hospitalized ward patients: a study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial 95%
- Statistical Analysis Plan for the Stepped-wedge Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of Electronic Early Notification of Sepsis in Hospitalized Ward Patients (SCREEN): a study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial 94%
- Decision support system to evaluate VENTilation in the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (DeVENT study) – Trial Protocol 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The COVID-19 Critical Care Consortium observational study: Design and rationale of a prospective, international, multicenter, observational study 93%
- Helmet noninvasive ventilation for COVID-19 patients (Helmet-COVID): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial 93%
- Performance of digital Early Warning Score (NEWS2) in a cardiac specialist setting: retrospective cohort study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Probabilistic analysis of COVID-19 patients' individual length of stay in Swiss intensive care units 93%
- Triaging and Referring In Adjacent General and Emergency Departments (the TRIAGE trial): a cluster randomised controlled trial 92%
- Randomised, controlled, feasibility trial comparing vasopressor infusion administered via peripheral cannula versus central venous catheter for critically ill adults: a study protocol 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prone positioning of patients with moderate hypoxia due to COVID-19: A multicenter pragmatic randomized trial [COVID-PRONE] 93%
- Risk stratification of patients admitted to hospital with covid-19 using the ISARIC WHO Clinical Characterisation Protocol: development and validation of the 4C Mortality Score 90%
- Clinical Decision Support in Cardiovascular Medicine: Effectiveness, Implementation Barriers, and Regulation 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of atypical intrahospital transfers on patient outcomes: a mixed methods study 90%
- Using explainable machine learning to identify patients at risk of reattendance at discharge from emergency departments 90%
- A sweat lactate sensor for detecting anaerobic threshold in patients with heart failure: a prospective clinical trial (LacS-001) 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.