Back

Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Anomalous Pulmonary Venous Return: A Multicenter Case Series.

Estrada, C.; Baqal, O.; Singh Sidhu, M.; Kim, J. Y.; de Sousa Barzon Serra, V.; Kodikoppa Somappa, A.; Rodriguez-Riascos, J. F.; Rojas, C. A.; Srivathsan, K.

2026-10-05 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.09.30.26363976 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) has been observed in adults with anomalous pulmonary venous return (APVR), but data on catheter ablation outcomes in this population remain limited to case reports and small series. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 14 adult patients with confirmed APVR who underwent catheter ablation for AF at three tertiary academic centers in the United States between July 2003 and May 2025. Baseline, procedural, electroanatomic mapping, and outcome data were collected. Freedom from atrial arrhythmia recurrence was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: Mean age was 56 +/- 13 years and 79% were male. Heart failure was present in 64%, and hypertension and coronary artery disease in 43% each. Most had partial APVR (86%), and 57% had prior surgical correction. Radiofrequency ablation was used in all patients, combined with pulsed-field ablation in one. Acute success was achieved in all patients, although areas with residual pulmonary vein or SVC electrical activity were left untreated in 3 (21%). Non-pulmonary-vein electrical activity was more common in patients with prior surgical correction than in those without (43% vs 17%). Median follow-up was 3.4 years (IQR, 2.0-9.6). Freedom from arrhythmia recurrence was 78.6% at 1 year and 53.9% at 5 years. Two patients (14%) required reablation; complications occurred in 3 (21%) without long-term sequelae. Conclusions: Catheter ablation was acutely successful in all patients in this largest reported APVR cohort, despite substantial comorbidity burden and anatomic complexity. The arrhythmogenic substrate often extended beyond the anomalous vein, particularly in surgically corrected patients, supporting individualized, substrate-guided ablation in this population.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.