Back

TPCdesign: A guide to designing informative thermal performance experiments

Lyberger, K.; Nell, L. A.; Paaijmans, K. A.

2026-09-30 ecology
10.64898/2026.09.29.755419 bioRxiv
Show abstract

1. Thermal performance curves (TPCs) are widely used to quantify temperature dependence of biological traits, but estimating them requires experiments across multiple temperatures. Because these experiments can be costly, researchers must balance the number and placement of temperature treatments against replication within treatments. Evenly spaced temperatures are a common default, but may allocate effort inefficiently when thermal responses are nonlinear or strongly asymmetric. 2. We developed TPCdesign, an R package for planning temperature-trait experiments. TPCdesign uses a pseudo-Bayesian (robust) D-optimal experimental design to identify sets of temperatures expected to provide the most information about a TPC, while allowing users to incorporate prior knowledge of thermal limits and curve shape, uncertainty in that knowledge, available numbers of treatments, and practical restrictions on temperature spacing. 3. Using simulation-based worked examples, we show that optimized designs can recover TPCs more accurately than evenly spaced designs, particularly for asymmetric curves and when the number of available temperature treatments is modest. Optimization primarily improves resolution of regions where performance changes rapidly and can substantially improve estimation of upper thermal limits while retaining information across the rest of the curve. 4. TPCdesign provides a practical framework for allocating limited experimental resources according to the biological response researchers seek to estimate. Rather than prescribing a universal set of temperatures, it allows experimental designs to reflect existing biological knowledge, uncertainty, and logistical constraints, improving the information gained from costly thermal performance experiments.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.