Back

Programmable sequence-resolved in situ profiling of glycoRNA-protein interactomes by GlycoRNA-Map

Zhang, X.; Zhu, Y.; Baumer, K.; Lu, Y.; Fu, Y.; Liao, J.; Shao, X.; Chang, Y.; Qiao, E.; Dong, H.; Valverde, A. S.; Yeh, H.-C.; Chen, S.-H.; Renata, H.; Ma, Y.

2026-09-30 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.09.29.755375 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cell-surface glycoRNAs participate in diverse biological processes, but they were investigated as pooled populations and the protein interactome of individual glycoRNA species remain unresolved. Here we develop GlycoRNA-Map, a programmable photocatalytic proximity-labeling method that maps proteins surrounding sequence-defined endogenous glycoRNAs on living cells. A sialic-acid-binding aptamer and an RNA-hybridization probe jointly recruit a fluorophore-modified oligonucleotide through dual recognition of the glycan and RNA moieties of glycoRNAs. Light-activated biotinylation followed by quantitative mass spectrometry identified 200-418 enriched proteins for each of five glycoRNAs in A549 cells. Comparison of these proteomes revealed limited overlap among different glycoRNA sequences and across cell types, demonstrating that glycoRNA-associated protein environments depend on both RNA identity and cellular context. Transforming growth factor-{beta} receptors 1 and 2 (TGFBR1 and TGFBR2) were identified in the proximal proteomes of multiple glycoRNAs. Removal of cell-surface RNAs enhanced TGF-{beta} receptor signaling and promoted cell migration, demonstrating that glycoRNAs can functionally regulate extracellular signaling by interacting with their protein neighborhoods. GlycoRNA-Map thus provides an accessible strategy for resolving sequence-specific glycoRNA-protein interactome and discovering their roles in membrane signaling.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.