Back

Systematic exploration of predicted quaternary structures within pandemic-relevant viral proteomes

Han, Y.; Narain, R.; Abbara, R.; Afonso, M. Q. L.; Austin, J.; Bertoni, D.; Cha, S.; Cowen-Rivers, A. I.; Ellaway, J. I. J.; Fransos, D.; Gion, K.; Hsu, D.; Hulo, C.; Kim, R. S.; Kovalevskiy, O.; Laydon, A.; Mason, J.; Nair, S.; Paramval, U.; Patel, N.; Patel, R.; Pidruchna, I.; Ratcliff, J.; Tsenkov, M. I.; Vanenzi, N. A. E.; Vollmar, M.; Wahome, N.; Wong, E. L. H.; Fleming, J. R.; Velankar, S.; Mirdita, M.; Le Mercier, P.; Steinegger, M.; Dallago, C.; Grove, J.

2026-10-01 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.09.29.755321 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Mechanistic understanding of viral protein-protein interactions enables global health security and pandemic preparedness, yet experimental characterisation remains difficult, costly, and often restricted to specialised laboratories. Here, we describe an in silico campaign using AlphaFold2 and AlphaFold-Multimer to predict monomers and dimer structures within 2,812 viral proteomes from 23 viral families relevant to human health. We report high-confidence predicted structures of 5,279 hetero-, and 2,749 homo-dimers. Structural clustering of interfaces reduces the set fivefold to 1,598 consolidated by form and function, of which 471 (29.5%) lacked detectable similarity to experimentally determined interfaces in the PDB. These clusters yielded two notable findings: new data on vaccinology-relevant glycoproteins, and accurate prediction of the specificity and cleavage-site recognition of viral proteases, which are targets for anti-viral development. Viral monomers and high-confidence dimers are available for interactive browsing in the Pandemic Preparedness Portal of the AlphaFold Database (https://alphafold.ebi.ac.uk/), and the full dataset is available for bulk download.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.