The development of navigation and attentional abilities shapes how children explore naturalistic environments
Wan, Q.; Moriarty, N.; Duarte, S.; Ghetti, S.; Geng, J. J.
Show abstract
Exploration is fundamental to how children learn about the world. To explore a new environment comprehensively, a child must navigate without getting lost while simultaneously attending to salient information along the way. Both abilities improve across childhood, yet most studies examine them in isolation, often in constrained spaces with limited sensory complexity. Here, we asked 7- to 14-year-old children (N=42) and young adults (18-22; N=42) to freely explore a large furniture store in immersive virtual reality, which contained many objects and attention-capturing multisensory events. Surprisingly, despite traveling comparable distances, children explored less - they covered less spatial area and examined fewer unique objects than adults. Fine-grained analyses of their behaviors showed that the reduction in exploration was due to children spending more time backtracking and children taking longer to adapt to salient multisensory objects, which were uncorrelated across individuals after controlling for age and independently predicted exploration. However, only backtracking duration predicted success in a subsequent search task, demonstrating a link between navigational success during exploration and the quality of learned spatial representations for later use. Together, the results demonstrate that children explore less comprehensively than adults in large-scale spaces because they are susceptible to getting lost and perseverating on salient events nested within a large environment, but that these behaviors change with age. This suggests that while children are widely considered to be curious explorers within local environments, their ability to do so within larger environments is shaped by the maturation of cognitive systems that integrate experiences over complex contexts.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Improvement in auditory spatial discrimination from ambiguous visual stimuli is not explained by ideal observer causal inference 91%
- Comparing the impact of contextual associations and statistical regularities in visual search and attention orienting 91%
- Comparing self- and hetero-metacognition in the absence of verbal communication 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- An eye-tracking study of visual attention in chimpanzees and bonobos when viewing different tool-using techniques 90%
- Cleaner wrasse failed in early testing stages of both visual and spatial Working Memory paradigms 89%
- Common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) excel in a one-trial spatial memory test, yet perform poorly in a classical memory task 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.