Back

A Semi-Dry, Visually Comfortable c-VEP BCI with Short Calibration, Conservative Idle-State Behavior, and a VR Proof of Concept

dehais, F.; Maggi, E.; Cabrera-Castillos, K.

2026-10-05 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.09.29.754884 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Background and Objectives: Code-modulated visual evoked potentials (c-VEPs) provide fast and reliable control signals for reactive brain-computer interfaces (rBCIs). However, deployment beyond laboratories remains limited by visually intrusive stimulation, reliance on wet electroencephalography (EEG), and false activations during non-control periods. We introduce a usability-oriented c-VEP rBCI combining low-salience textured stimulation, slow flashing codes, asynchronous evidence accumulation, and semi-dry EEG acquisition. Methods: Thirty participants evaluated the system on a standard screen using an 11-class keypad typing task. Two identical online typing sessions were separated by a 2-min video-viewing period serving as an explicit idle condition. Feasibility was then assessed in virtual reality (VR) through a proof-of-concept shell-game task involving head movements and immersive rendering constraints. Visual comfort, peripheral distraction, and fatigue were assessed subjectively in both conditions. Results: In the keypad task, the system achieved 99.8% accuracy with 33 s of calibration data and a mean decoding time of 4.3 s. No spurious commands occurred during the tested 2-min idle condition. In VR, online accuracy reached 100%, with a mean decoding time of 5.6 s. Participants reported high visual comfort and minimal peripheral distraction in both conditions, although fatigue was higher in VR. Conclusion: The proposed c-VEP rBCI combines short calibration, high accuracy, comfortable stimulation, semi-dry EEG, and asynchronous decision-making. Performance during the explicit idle condition and VR implementation support the feasibility of wearable and practical c-VEP systems for self-paced interaction beyond laboratory environments. These findings encourage evaluation in longer idle periods and real-world tasks.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.