The Walking Brain: Mapping feature-specific cortical responses to naturally unfolding sensory experience in the real world
Altınkaynak, M.; Carlton, L. B.; Topkoc, E.; Boas, D. A.; Yücel, M. A.
Show abstract
Understanding how the brain processes the everyday world is fundamental, yet laboratory paradigms exclude self-generated movement, unscripted events, and a continuously evolving multisensory environment. Wearable neuroimaging enables real-world measurement, but linking neural activity to uncontrolled sensory information remains challenging. Here, we extend a feature-based framework from naturalistic movie viewing to everyday behavior using wearable whole-head high-density fNIRS and participant-specific audiovisual recordings during movies and outdoor walking with no explicit task or scripted audiovisual sequence. Luminance- and sound-related cortical maps showed significant spatial correspondence, particularly in visual and auditory regions, whereas face-related correspondence was weaker. Luminance- and face-related maps were reproducible within individuals across repeated walks. Additional exploratory analysis demonstrated, to our knowledge, the first out-of-sample encoding of continuous environmental features during unconstrained real-world fNIRS, predicting cortical activity during held-out walking periods. Together, these findings establish a feature-based framework for linking cortical activity to naturally unfolding sensory experience in everyday behavior.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- All spectral frequencies of neural activity reveal semantic representation in the human anterior ventral temporal cortex 93%
- Tracing the neural trajectories of evidence accumulation and motor preparation processes during voluntary decisions 93%
- Reliability and signal comparison of OPM-MEG, fMRI & iEEG in a repeated movie viewing paradigm 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.