Back

An Open Test--Retest Dataset of Rapid Myelin Mapping Acquisitions

Meisler, S. L.; Salo, T.; Cieslak, M.; Sevchik, B. L.; Brook, J.; Duhamel, G.; Girard, O. M.; Larsen, B.; Pandey, S.; Sisk, L. M.; Soustelle, L.; Sydnor, V. J.; Johnson, P.; Roalf, D. R.; Shinohara, R. T.; Taso, M.; Tisdall, M. D.; Satterthwaite, T. D.

2026-10-01 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.09.29.753255 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Myelin supports rapid and efficient neural communication and is implicated in brain development, learning, aging, and neurological disease. Although numerous magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) approaches have been proposed to characterize myelin in vivo, they have rarely been evaluated together within the same participants and across repeated acquisitions. To address these gaps, we introduce the Myelin Imaging Reliability and ReprOducibility Resource (MIRROR), an openly available multimodal test--retest MRI dataset of diffusion MRI (dMRI), inhomogeneous magnetization transfer imaging (ihMT), quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM), MP2RAGE, T1w/T2w ratio mapping, and transverse relaxometry in 22 healthy adults. We evaluated gray--white matter differentiation, intermetric correspondence, test--retest reliability, and participant specificity across 27 myelin-sensitive metrics. Gray--white matter differentiation was strong for dMRI derivatives, MP2RAGE-derived R1, T1w/T2w, and ihMT, while being substantially weaker for QSM measures. Intermetric spatial correlations were generally strongest within acquisition or modeling families. Test--retest reliability was generally high, particularly for dMRI-derived metrics, but was more variable among QSM-, ihMT-, and R2*-derived measures. Regional spatial profiles were also highly participant-specific, with discriminability approaching its upper bound for most metrics. All imaging data, derived maps, and processing code are openly released. MIRROR provides a benchmark for characterizing the measurement properties and practical tradeoffs of scalable myelin-sensitive MRI methods, supporting principled acquisition selection and accelerating methodological development and validation.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.