Back

cryoWEight: Conformational ensembles from cryo-EM particle images with weighted ensemble simulations

Ojha, A. A.; Prabhakar, P. R.; Andricioaei, I.; Hanson, S. M.

2026-09-30 biophysics
10.64898/2026.09.28.755042 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Atomistic simulations often struggle to capture the full conformational landscape of biomolecular complexes on experimentally relevant timescales, leaving gaps in our understanding of functionally relevant thermodynamics and kinetics. Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) provides high-resolution structural snapshots spanning multiple conformational states, but translating these static images into dynamic mechanisms remains challenging. Existing approaches for integrating cryo-EM data with molecular simulations either perturb the underlying dynamics through artificial biasing potentials or remain confined to conformations already present in the prior ensemble. We introduce cryoWEight, an automated and extensible Python framework that couples iterative weighted ensemble (WE) simulations with ensemble reweighting against cryo-EM particle images to steer simulation trajectories towards conformational states consistent with cryo-EM populations. We have found that reweighting in the image space introduces a directional bias towards the target distribution even when the prior ensemble has no overlap with the target distribution in the collective variable space. The reweighting requires only the state likelihoods that set the ensemble weights, and any observable that defines these likelihoods can serve as the target distribution, therefore generalizing beyond the application of cryo-EM. cryoWEight is validated on three proteins: chignolin, the N-terminal domain of ribosomal protein L9, and adenylate kinase. The framework converges towards the target conformational states across different sampling strategies and noise levels, providing a scalable route to integrate cryo-EM data with enhanced sampling approaches.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.