FilAdh: degradation-aware analysis of focal adhesions and actin stress fibers
Rey-Paniagua, G.; Garcia-Lopez-de-Haro, C.; Hernandez-Martinez, M.; Lachowski, D.; Munoz-Barrutia, A.
Show abstract
Focal adhesions (FAs) and actin stress fibers (SFs) are mechanically coupled but often analyzed separately. We present FilAdh, a unified framework for FA instance segmentation, SF instance reconstruction, morphometry, and FA-anchorage-based SF classification. Across 57 held-out HeLa, SUIT-2, and MRC-5 cell line images, FilAdh achieved the highest FA Dice, intersection over union (IoU), and recall and the highest SF clDice and skeleton precision among benchmarked methods; paired t tests with Holm correction indicated significant gains over all compared methods for FA Dice, IoU, and recall, and over classical methods for SF centerline metrics, with no significant differences detected relative to the deep-learning comparators. Conditional on expert-curated FA and SF masks, SFs were assigned to dorsal, ventral, and peripheral classes with 81.5%-87.3% accuracy. Controlled Poisson-Gaussian noise, Gaussian defocus, and point-spread-function blur revealed distinct, structure-specific errors in overlap and object-level measurements. By linking segmentation and reconstruction to count, area, length, apparent width, and structural class, FilAdh offers an interpretable view of the FA-actin structural system and makes degradation-dependent measurement biases explicit. BIGGER PICTURECells sense and respond to their physical environment through focal adhesions and actin stress fibers. The two form a mechanically coupled system, yet they are usually analyzed separately, with workflows re-tuned for each new set of images. FilAdh analyzes both within a single framework, tailoring segmentation, reconstruction, and classification to each structures geometry: compact adhesion patches versus thin, extended fiber networks. Testing on expert-annotated references and under controlled degradations that mimic low signal, focus errors, and optical blur shows that these common imaging imperfections distort adhesion and fiber measurements in different ways. The same design principle--matching the analysis to each structures shape and judging methods by how errors propagate into the final biological measurements--may benefit other bioimage-analysis problems. Released code, trained weights, and fixed data splits make all comparisons reproducible and extensible. HIGHLIGHTSO_LIFilAdh jointly quantifies focal adhesions and actin stress fibers C_LIO_LIFilAdh achieves the highest benchmarked FA overlap and comparable SF topology C_LIO_LIMatched synthetic degradations reveal geometry-specific measurement errors C_LIO_LIFA-SF spatial context enables dorsal, ventral, and peripheral SF classification C_LI
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Synthetic data enables human-grade microtubule analysis with foundation models for segmentation 94%
- DREAMER-S: Deep leaRning-Enabled Attention-based Multiple-instance approaches with Explainable Representations for Spatial Biology 94%
- A Deep Learning approach for time-consistent cell cycle phase prediction from microscopy data 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.