Back

Methylglyoxal-derived glycation tunes nuclear viscoelasticity

Alcaraz-Hurtado, M.; Duchalet, A.; Salinas-Torres, A.; Musliu, E.; Jordanov, G.; Rodriguez-Ramos, J.; Silva-Rojas, R.; Fourny, N.; Bautista-Aguilera, O. M.; Adrover, M.; Alegre Cebollada, J.; Bertrand, L.; Dumitru, A. C.

2026-10-02 biophysics
10.64898/2026.09.28.754974 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Reactive carbonyl metabolites such as methylglyoxal (MGO) accumulate in diabetes, aging, and metabolic disease, conditions frequently associated with pathological stiffening of human cells and tissues. While glycation of extracellular matrices and cytoskeletal proteins is known to contribute to these mechanical changes, whether the nucleus itself is a direct mechanical target of carbonyl stress remains unknown. Here, by combining advanced atomic force microscopy-based nanomechanical probing with correlative confocal imaging, we show that MGO-derived glycation directly remodels isolated cell nuclei, increasing stiffness, reducing fluidity, and restricting intranuclear deformation propagation. MGO-derived adducts accumulate prominently at the nuclear envelope, and perturbation of lamin A/C and chromatin state reveals that both structures contribute to glycation-induced stiffening. In cells, chronic MGO exposure induces nucleus-intrinsic stiffening and biases YAP nuclear localization in a substrate-stiffness-dependent manner, linking nuclear glycation to altered mechanosensitive regulation. In vivo, cardiac nuclear stiffening is only observed along with increased immunodetected MGO-adduct burden, while nuclear fluidity remains largely preserved. Together, these findings establish nonenzymatic glycation as a metabolic mechanism that remodels nuclear mechanics and alters cellular mechanosensing, revealing a previously unrecognized physical consequence of carbonyl stress.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.