A shared circuit architecture for multiscale signal recognition in crickets
Mann, W.; Cho, D.; Gray, D. A.; Hennig, R. M.; Clemens, J.
Show abstract
Communication signals often contain behaviorally relevant structure on multiple temporal scales. Short-timescale features are commonly thought to be recognized first and then integrated into longer-timescale representations. Whether a shared circuit can instead recognize multiple timescales remains unclear. Cricket calling songs provide a tractable test because millisecond-scale pulses are grouped into chirps lasting hundreds of milliseconds. We combined female phonotaxis with a mechanistic model of the identified pulse-recognition network to ask whether this circuitry can also generate chirp selectivity. In Gryllus bimaculatus, the model, originally parameterized from pulse-scale electrophysiology and behavior, recovered the main boundaries of chirp preference without fitting to chirp behavior. Coincidence detection generated the minimum chirp-duration requirement, whereas suppressive computations in the networks input neuron shaped the upper boundaries for chirp duty cycle and period. Across 14 species, varying these suppressive computations captured major differences in chirp tuning. These findings reveal a temporally interleaved serial circuit in which long-timescale selectivity begins upstream of completed short-timescale selectivity, offering an alternative to both conventional short-first hierarchies and parallel pathways.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A small, computationally flexible network produces the phenotypic diversity of song recognition in crickets 96%
- Front-end Weber-Fechner gain control enhances the fidelity of combinatorial odor coding 94%
- Linage priming and cell type proportioning depends on the interplay between stochastic and deterministic factors 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.