Back

Modeling the Neurocircuitry Involved in Binge Drinking

Rude, A.; Hayek, N.; Lapish, C.; Kuznetsov, A.

2026-10-02 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.09.28.754793 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Binge drinking is characterized by an initial bout of rapid, high-vigor alcohol intake (front-loading) followed by a prolonged period of lower-rate "maintenance" drinking, yet the circuit mechanisms that generate and regulate these phases remain unclear. Here, we develop a systems-level computational model that links the structure of binge drinking to interactions among medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), insula, striatum, and ventral tegmental area (VTA). The model consists of cortical Seek (mPFC) and Go (insula) populations that form a mutually excitatory loop, a SetPoint population that integrates striatal activity as an internal estimate of effort/consumption, ventral (nucleus accumbens, NAc) and dorsal (dorsolateral striatum, DLS) striatal populations, and a dopaminergic VTA population providing transient reward-prediction signaling. Using a firing-rate formalism with noisy dynamics, we reproduce the canonical two-phase binge pattern and show that: (i) the PFC-insula loop acts as a bistable module that initiates and sustains front-loading; (ii) striato-cortical feedback to the Setpoint population controls the timing of the transition from front-loading to maintenance without altering its vigor; and (iii) the amplitude of the VTA dopamine transient selectively scales front-loading intensity. Sensitivity analyses identify PFC-insula connectivity, VTA-to-NAc modulation, and striato-cortical feedback as key parameters that bifurcate two-phase drinking into regimes with abolished or persistent front-loading. These findings provide a mechanistic framework for interpreting binge-like alcohol intake in terms of identifiable circuit motifs and generate testable predictions for targeting mPFC-insula-striatal-VTA interactions in alcohol use disorder.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.