Protocells reproduce morphological and chemical signatures of early microfossils
Gillet de Chalonge, L.; Field, K.; Dignam, R.; Coutant, M.; Loron, C.; van Zuilen, M. A.; Jordan, S. F.
Show abstract
Identification of early microfossils relies on morphological and chemical criteria assumed to be unique to life, but whether abiotic microstructures can satisfy these criteria has not been rigorously tested. Hydrothermal environments preserve microfossils but are also efficient geochemical reactors for abiotic reactions. Protocells form in hydrothermal conditions and represent a plausible abiotic analogue to early microfossils. Here we show that protocells form from simple organic molecules in low-temperature, alkaline hydrothermal conditions in the presence of silica and produce spheres, filaments, and lenticular structures that strongly resemble the morphology of purported microfossils in Archaean silica cherts. FTIR spectroscopy provides overlapping chemical signatures across protocells, microorganisms, and geologic microstructures. In addition, the FTIR R3/2 ratio, a chemometric index often used to discriminate domains and determine biogenicity, identifies eight different protocell systems as either bacterial, archaeal, or eukaryotic. These data suggest that protocells preserved in ancient hydrothermal deposits can satisfy current biogenicity criteria, undermining the reliability of interpretations of the early fossil record. As life detection is the primary objective for current space exploration endeavours, robust biogenicity protocols that account for abiotic signatures are essential.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Histological and Metagenomic Analysis of Microbial Communities in Archaeological Human Bones 91%
- Effects of physical, chemical, and biological ageing on the mineralization of pine wood biochar by a Streptomyces isolate 91%
- Iron can be microbially extracted from Lunar and Martian regolith simulants and 3D printed into tough structural materials 90%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.