Knowing when, what, and how to push: Examining the operationalization of task challenge in routine stroke rehabilitation practice using focused video analysis

Background: Task challenge is recognized as a core principle of neurorehabilitation and is frequently mentioned within stroke rehabilitation guidelines. However, guidance for operationalizing challenge in clinical practice remains limited. Examining how therapists and people with stroke currently use challenge in practice may help address this gap. Objective: To examine how challenge is operationalized in routine stroke rehabilitation practice. Methods: This study used focused video analysis to examine eight video-recorded stroke rehabilitation sessions across physiotherapy, occupational therapy, and speech-language therapy contexts. Video data were supplemented by observational memos. Analysis was conducted iteratively through four stages: immersion, detailed transcription, in-depth episode analysis, and comparative analysis. These stages enabled examination of material, embodied, social, and contextual aspects of challenge-related interactions as they unfolded during rehabilitation. Results: Twenty individuals, comprising four patient-therapist dyads and four triads participated. Challenge was operationalized through three intersecting practices: (i) Structuring challenge-related work through temporal phases determined when challenge was introduced, experienced, and consolidated across the session and within tasks; (ii) Establishing the macro-architecture of challenge guided what and how it was operationalized by constructing a challenge plan, shaping an optimal bandwidth by tailoring challenge to the persons abilities and/or experiences, and facilitating its transfer beyond the session; (iii) Modulating challenge through micro-calibrations involved moment-to-moment adjustments (e.g., adapting physical assistance, communication style, environmental setup) to modulate active practice, navigate differing perspectives, and cultivate an atmosphere conducive to engaging with challenge. These overarching practices were dynamically enacted through a range of explicit and implicit practices. Conclusion: Challenge in stroke rehabilitation is not merely a task parameter; it is operationalized through an interplay of explicit and implicit practices that structure and enable its responsive implementation. Considering challenge through these practices may help therapists and people with stroke co-construct meaningful experiences of challenge, both within and beyond formal stroke rehabilitation sessions.