Identifying genetic variants causal for multiple long-term conditions: informing opportunities for intervention and prevention
Voller, B.; Woodward, R. M.; Murrin, O.; Delgado, J.; Türkmen, D.; Hopkins, R.; Violan, C.; Mancini, M.; Farmer, L.; Boddy, K.; Fox, C.; Lamb, S. E.; Dudbridge, F.; Bowden, J.; Frayling, T. M.; Masoli, J. A.; Pilling, L. C.; the GEMINI Consortium,
Show abstract
Multiple long-term conditions (MLTC), the coexistence of two or more long-term conditions (LTCs) in an individual, is an increasingly prevalent and complex clinical challenge. We aimed to uncover opportunities for therapeutic intervention in MLTC and highlight potential adverse effects using genetics to identify shared biological pathways across conditions. Across 72 heritable LTCs common in adults aged [≥]65, we analysed genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics from meta-analyses incorporating up to three data sources (UK Biobank, FinnGen, and condition-specific consortia) from genetically European-ancestry participants. Across 843 condition pairs sharing genome-wide significant variants, we performed statistical colocalisation to identify shared causal genetic variants. Variants showing evidence of causality for [≥]3 LTCs were prioritised for investigation of likely causal genes, biological pathways, and druggability. Findings were replicated in Our Future Health (OFH, N=550,000). Colocalisation analyses identified 281 genetic variants causal for specific LTC pairs and 85 variants causal for [≥]3 LTCs. These 85 variants were located in 34 genomic regions with strong evidence of shared causality across multiple conditions. Thirteen of the 34 regions fully replicated in OFH, with others having partial replication. Eight variants showed concordant directions of effects across conditions, suggesting potential opportunities for drug development; results include a variant in GDF7 causal for diverticular disease, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, and prostate cancer, suggesting multisystemic mechanisms and a novel intervention target for this cluster of conditions. We identified six potential drug repurposing opportunities involving clinically targeted proteins, including LPA and IRF5 for cardiovascular and immune-mediated inflammatory conditions, respectively. Fifteen variants showed discordant effects across phenotypes, suggesting possible adverse consequences of pharmacological intervention; for example, a variant in GIPR reduced risk of obesity and sleep apnoea whilst increasing risk of breast cancer. These findings reveal shared mechanisms underlying MLTC and highlight opportunities for therapeutic development and repurposing, whilst also identifying possible adverse effects.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk factors for long COVID: analyses of 10 longitudinal studies and electronic health records in the UK 92%
- The genetic underpinnings of variable penetrance and expressivity of pathogenic mutations in cardiometabolic traits 91%
- A unified framework for estimating country-specific cumulative incidence for 18 diseases stratified by polygenic risk 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Exome sequencing and analysis of 44,028 British South Asians enriched for high autozygosity 93%
- Genome-wide analysis in 756,646 individuals provides first genetic evidence that ACE2 expression influences COVID-19 risk and yields genetic risk scores predictive of severe disease 93%
- Sequencing of over 100,000 individuals identifies multiple genes and rare variants associated with Crohns disease susceptibility 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Complex patterns of multimorbidity associated with severe COVID-19 and Long COVID 93%
- Sex-specific transcriptome similarity networks elucidate comorbidity relationships 91%
- The Interpretable Multimodal Machine Learning (IMML) framework reveals pathological signatures of distal sensorimotor polyneuropathy 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.