ctDNA Release Heterogeneity in Luminal Breast Cancer Revealed by Single-Cell Multi-Omics Spatial Analysis
Xu, H.; Pu, P.; Liu, B.; Gong, Y.; Wu, J.; Guo, C.; Cao, H.; Jia, Z.; Liu, Y.; Huang, Y.; Ma, D.; Li, J.; Guo, Z.; Shang, T.; Cong, L.; Zhou, R.; Ouyang, Q.; Wang, X.; Wang, Y.; Su, J.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, J.
Show abstract
Backgroud Breast cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality, and HR+/HER2-; is the predominant subtype. Molecular pathology, including PIK3CA and ESR1 mutation, informs prognosis and treatment selection. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) offers a non-invasive approach for cancer monitoring, but its clinical utility is limited by tissue plasma discordance, reflecting heterogeneous ctDNA release. The cellular and spatial determinants of this release remain poorly understood, particularly in HR+/HER2-; subtype, where heterogeneity across subclones complicates liquid biopsy interpretation. Results To identify the cellular and spatial determinants of ctDNA release, we developed scMASTER, integrating single-cell transcriptomes and mutations, spatial transcriptomics and matched tumor and plasma DNA sequencing. In ten patients with non-metastatic HR+/HER2- breast cancer, eight recurrent malignant epithelial states showed distinct ctDNA release potential. Antigen-presentation, stress, mitosis and mesenchymal-like states showed high release. PIK3CA and ESR1 mutations were linked to distinct functional states and altered ctDNA detectability. Three spatial architectures, EMT-enriched regions, intraductal luminal progenitors and avascular hypoxic zones, showed high release. Tumor-microenvironment interactions were bidirectional: anti-tumoral immunity correlated with reduced release, whereas immunomodulatory components correlated with increased release. A stratification model based on these features identified high-risk, immunosuppressed patients with poor prognosis, validated across external cohorts. Conclusions Our study establishes a single-cell spatial framework for decoding ctDNA release heterogeneity, linking tumor states, somatic mutations, spatial architecture, and immune interactions to ctDNA release. These findings provide mechanistic insights into tissue-plasma discordance, offer a biological rationale for interpreting ctDNA dynamics, refine patient risk stratification and liquid biopsy-based monitoring in HR+/HER2-; breast cancer.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The clinical and molecular significance associated with STING signaling in estrogen receptor-positive early breast cancer 95%
- HIF-1 regulated TPM3 links hypoxia to motility and invasion beyond the hypoxic fraction in triple-negative breast cancer 94%
- RNA Sequencing-Based Single Sample Predictors of Molecular Subtype and Risk of Recurrence for Clinical Assessment of Early-Stage Breast Cancer 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Mutational landscape of pure ductal carcinoma in situ and associations with disease prognosis and response to radiotherapy 94%
- Clustering of HR+/HER2- breast cancer in an Asian cohort is driven by immune phenotypes 94%
- Lineage plasticity enables low-ER luminal tumors to evolve and gain basal-like traits 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and validation of a gene expression score to account for tumour purity and improve prognostication in breast cancer 95%
- Germline genomic landscapes of breast cancer patients significantly predict clinical outcomes 95%
- Deep learning inference of cell type-specific gene expression from breast tumor histopathology 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep plasma proteomics identifies and validates an eight-protein biomarker panel that separate benign from malignant tumors in ovarian cancer 91%
- Multi-resolution deep learning characterizestertiary lymphoid structures in solid tumors 91%
- Leveraging sequences missing from the human genome to diagnose cancer 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.