Back

Hyperexcitable but seizure-free: hippocampal network dysfunction in a Wolfram syndrome model

Ahmadi, S.; Pinera, J. G.; Dokholyan, S.; Sauerbeck, A. D.; Phan, H. N.; Carman, B.; Debnath, A.; Brunwasser, S.; Skinner, G.; Rensing, N.; Wong, M.; Cearlock, C.; Maloney, S. E.; Kummer, T. T.; Singamaneni, S.; Cirrito, J.; Foutz, T. J.; Urano, F.

2026-10-02 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.09.27.754840 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Wolfram syndrome (WS) is a rare, life-limiting progressive neurodegenerative disorder caused by pathogenic variants in the WFS1 gene. It is a prototype endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress disorder, and the mechanisms underlying neurological phenotypes in WS remain incompletely understood. Although WFS1 protein is abundant in the hippocampus, the role of this region in WS remains relatively understudied. Here we characterize hippocampal function across scales in mice carrying a patient orthologous Wfs1 variant (p.W542*) on both alleles. Male mutants lose excitatory synapses, and dissociated hippocampal neurons are markedly hyperexcitable yet generate no increase in network bursting and no shift in network criticality, indicating that their additional firing is not recruited into coordinated population activity. This finding translates in vivo wherein intracranial electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings show no epileptiform activity or seizures in either sex, with no hippocampal astrogliosis, alongside a male-specific reduction in hippocampal low-gamma power. Additionally, EEG demonstrates a sex-specific disruption of sleep, which parallels a sex-divergent synaptic phenotype. Mutant male mice show impaired hippocampus-dependent fear memory and reduced voluntary motor activity. Taken together, we propose that cellular hyperexcitability in the WS hippocampus does not translate into increased network bursting, potentially due to disproportionate loss of excitatory synapses. This dissociation may provide a functional substrate for the neurological features of WS.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.