Back

Simulating Bead-Tethered Biomolecules: Force-Probe Coupled Steered Molecular Dynamics (fp-SMD) in Optical Tweezers Force Spectroscopy

Zhang, G.; Leng, Y.

2026-10-02 biophysics
10.64898/2026.09.27.754810 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Interpreting single-molecule force spectroscopy (SMFS) data from optical tweezers with steered molecular dynamics (SMD) is hindered by a severe timescale mismatch: SMD trajectories span nanoseconds to microseconds, while SMFS experiments unfold over milliseconds to seconds, forcing SMD to pull six to nine orders of magnitude faster than experiment and systematically distorting rupture forces, molecular pathways, and kinetic intermediates. We introduce force-probe coupled steered molecular dynamics (fp-SMD), which explicitly propagates the force probe (the optically trapped bead) alongside the biomolecule within a single classical Hamiltonian description of the coupled molecule-linker-bead system. A Predict-Correct Trajectory Propagation (PCTP) scheme resolves the resulting computational bottleneck by decoupling the fast molecular relaxation from the slow, macroscopic bead motion, using metadynamics and transition-state theory to identify the kinetically resolved molecular intermediate reached at each macroscopic time step. On the cholesterol-{beta}-cyclodextrin ({beta}-CD) host-guest complex, fp-SMD reproduces the experimental rupture-force histogram directly at matched conditions, without extrapolation from standard SMD. fp-SMD further resolves how applied force reshapes the molecular escape pathway itself--cholesterol dissociates via a high-angle route at low force and a direct, small-angle route at high force--providing, to our knowledge, the first direct structural evidence for force-induced pathway switching within small host-guest systems believed to underlie catch-slip bond behavior. fp-SMD/PCTP thus offers a general route to simulating force-probe-coupled biomolecular mechanics at experimentally relevant timescales.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.