Health-Related Quality of Life, Healthcare Utilization, and Expenditure in US Adults With Myocardial Infarction and Heart Failure: The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey 2019 to 2024
Hasan, I.; Jafary, Z. I.; Rana, S.; Thyagaturu, H.
Show abstract
Background: Myocardial infarction (MI) and heart failure (HF) impose a physical and emotional toll that has not been measured nationally with a standard instrument. Methods: We pooled the 2019 to 2024 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey into 4 mutually exclusive groups of adults aged 18 and older: MI without HF, HF without MI, both conditions, and neither condition. Quality of life was assessed with the Veterans RAND 12-item component summaries, T scores (mean 50, SD 10) on which higher is better and 3 points is minimally important. Survey-weighted linear regression adjusted for demographics, socioeconomic factors, and comorbidity. Results: Among 79,853 adults representing 253.8 million US adults, 4.2% (3,340) had MI alone, 0.6% (480) HF alone, and 0.3% (236) both. Unadjusted physical scores ranged from 33.2 with HF alone to 39.1 with MI alone, versus 50.5 with neither. Adjusted physical scores were lower by 3.84 points (95% CI, 3.20-4.47) with MI alone, 8.32 (95% CI, 7.04-9.61) with HF alone, and 7.74 (95% CI, 5.73-9.76) with both, each beyond the minimally important threshold. Adjusted mental scores were lower by 1.35 points with MI alone, 1.20 with HF alone, and 1.69 with both, all below that threshold. Adults with both conditions did not differ from those with HF alone (0.58 points; 95% CI, -1.76 to 2.92). Emergency visits, inpatient discharges, and expenditure were higher in every cardiac group and highest with both conditions, where annual expenditure reached $37,198 versus $7,845 with neither. Conclusions: Physical quality of life fell steadily across the cardiac groups, with HF rather than prior MI accounting for most of it. The difference in mental quality of life did not persist after adjustment. Utilization and spending were highest with both conditions.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Inequalities in access to and outcomes of cardiac surgery in England: retrospective analysis of Hospital Episode Statistics (2010-2019) 91%
- Place and causes of acute cardiovascular mortality during the COVID19 pandemic: retrospective cohort study of 580,972 deaths in England and Wales, 2014 to 2020 91%
- Evaluation of Indicators of Reproducibility and Transparency in Published Cardiology Literature 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- State-level structural racism and incident coronary heart disease 94%
- Persistent Sex Disparities in Pre-hospital Delay Among STEMI Patients Despite Overall Improvements: Findings from the Chinese Cardiovascular Association Chest Pain Center Registry 93%
- Social Networks and Cardiovascular Disease Events in the Jackson Heart Study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of left ventricular assist devices and heart transplant on acute myocardial infarction and heart failure mortality and readmission measures 93%
- The association of cardiovascular disease and other pre-existing comorbidities with COVID-19 mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis 92%
- Predicting 30-Day and 1-Year Mortality in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical presentation, disease course and outcome of COVID-19 in hospitalized patients with and without pre-existing cardiac disease – a cohort study across sixteen countries 91%
- Artificial Intelligence Methods to Detect Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (AIM-HFpEF) within Electronic Health Records: An equitable disease prediction model 91%
- Mortality Risk and Treatment Disparities in the Chinese SMuRF-less STEMI Patients: A Nationwide Cohort Study 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.