STAMP-LME: A spatiotemporal surface-mapping framework for population-level iEEG
Blenkmann, A. O.; Leske, S. L.; Knight, R.; Solbakk, A.-K.; Oostenveld, R.
Show abstract
Intracranial EEG (iEEG) affords a unique opportunity to assess human neural activity with millisecond temporal resolution and millimeter spatial precision. However, group-level statistical analyses remain challenging due to sparse and heterogeneous electrode coverage, anatomical variability, and the difficulty of integrating spatiotemporal responses across individuals. Most iEEG studies therefore define brain regions of interest for the group analysis, sacrificing a spatial resolution strength of iEEG and excluding data outside those regions of interest. Here, we present a spatiotemporal analysis and mapping with permutation-based linear mixed-effects models (STAMP-LME), a cortical-mapping framework for population-level iEEG analysis independent of predefined cortical regions of interest. STAMP-LME is a complete processing pipeline spanning electrode localization, mapping to a standardized surface of the cortical mantle, including medial, orbitofrontal, and insular regions, and statistical inference at the cortical level. Electrode-level data from each participant is mapped to a standardized cortical surface using weights that account for electrode-to-cortex distance and confidence in cortical sampling. Brain signals are then combined with a spatial smoothing kernel and entered into LME models at each vertex-node and time point. Data-derived null distributions are generated through controlled permutations and used for spatiotemporal inference with threshold-free cluster enhancement (TFCE) or false-discovery-rate (FDR) correction. We validated STAMP-LME using simulations with known cortical ground truth while varying effect size, interparticipant source-location variability, electrode coverage, and spatial smoothing. The framework reliably detected simulated effects and recovered their spatiotemporal distribution while maintaining low localization error and limiting false-positive detections across different sampling conditions. We then applied the method to intracranial recordings from nine individuals performing an auditory oddball task. The empirical analysis revealed distributed auditory cortical responses consistent with conventional channel-level analyses, while providing more fine-grained group-level activation maps across sampled cortical regions. STAMP-LME provides a flexible, open-source framework for data-driven population-level cortical iEEG analysis that preserves the spatiotemporal strengths of intracranial recordings while accounting for sparse and heterogeneous electrode coverage. The structured workflow enables reproducible and anatomically precise group-level inference on a standardized cortical surface and facilitates comparison with surface-based fMRI and source-localized M/EEG results, therefore providing a practical tool for cognitive and clinical neuroscience research.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Extracting Reproducible Components from Electroencephalographic Responses to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with Group Task-Related Component Analysis 94%
- A supervised data-driven spatial filter denoising method for speech artifacts in intracranial electrophysiological recordings 94%
- Dynamic Network Analysis of Electrophysiological Task Data 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Event-marked Windowed Communication: Inferring activity propagation from neural time series 95%
- Comparison between EEG and MEG of static and dynamic resting-state networks 94%
- Connectome spectrum electromagnetic tomography: a method to reconstruct electrical brain source-networks at high-spatial resolution 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison of whole-brain task-modulated functional connectivity methods for fMRI task connectomics 93%
- A novel description of the network dynamics underpinning working memory 93%
- Cortical representational geometry of diverse tasks reveals subject-specific and subject-invariant cognitive structures 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.