SHERLOCK: Structured representation learning and causal inference of downstream perturbation effects
Zhang, M.; Myers, J. D.; Shi, L.; Giglio, R. M.; Chatterjee, S.; McFaline-Figueroa, J. L.; Azizi, E.
Show abstract
Understanding the effects of genetic, molecular, and experimental perturbations is essential for decoding cellular mechanisms and guiding biomedical interventions. Existing computational approaches are typically designed for individual tasks, such as predicting perturbation responses, characterizing downstream transcriptional effects, or modeling perturbation combinations, and therefore do not provide a unified framework for learning interpretable perturbation representations while enabling causal analysis of downstream effects and characterization of condition-dependent responses. We present SHERLOCK, an interpretable deep generative framework for single-cell perturbation analysis that represents perturbation effects as structured interventions on a latent baseline cellular state. SHERLOCK learns correlated and sparse perturbation representations that organize genetic and pharmacological perturbations according to shared transcriptional responses. % By formulating perturbations as interventions within a structural causal model, it enables counterfactual estimation of their downstream transcriptional effects under explicit identifiability assumptions. The same framework quantifies how perturbation responses vary across conditions and compositionally models combinatorial perturbations, enabling prediction of held-out combinations and classification of genetic interactions. Across genome-scale CRISPR, chemical, and spatial perturbation datasets, SHERLOCK recovers perturbation relationships concordant with known biological pathways and pharmacological properties, identifies condition-dependent responses, and predicts combinatorial perturbation effects. Together, SHERLOCK provides a unified framework for interpretable and causal analysis of perturbation effects across diverse single-cell perturbation experiments.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Learning multi-cellular representations of single-cell transcriptomics data enables characterization of patient-level disease states 96%
- TarDis: Achieving Robust and Structured Disentanglement of Multiple Covariates 96%
- Inferring high-dimensional pathways of trait acquisition in evolution and disease 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.