Back

Pop-Corn: Predicting Perturbation Phenotype Effects Across Single-Cell and Spatial Contexts

Chen, J.; Cui, Y.; Shao, Y.; Sun, N.; Martinez, M. R.

2026-09-26 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.09.25.754560 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Genetic perturbations can reshape cell populations by altering the relative abundance of specific cell types and states within the profiled population, including increases, decreases and states that become detectable after perturbation. Pooled single-cell screens, such as Perturb-seq, measure such responses at scale. However, only a small fraction of possible perturbations can be tested experimentally. A central challenge is therefore to predict compositional shifts induced by unseen perturbations. Many perturbation-prediction methods do not directly optimize for this outcome; instead, they predict gene-expression responses and infer cell-type and cell-state composition downstream. Surprisingly, we find that even models that accurately predict perturbation-induced changes in average gene expression perform poorly at forecasting these compositional shifts. To address this gap, we present Pop-Corn, a method that directly predicts how a perturbation reshapes cell-type composition without reconstructing gene expression. In the primary T-cell benchmark, Pop-Corn predicted the overall cell-state composition of held-out perturbations more accurately than the evaluated expression-prediction pipelines, while better preserving the diversity of observed cell states. We further extend Pop-Corn to intact tissue, where it predicts perturbation-induced cell-type proportion changes in local cellular neighborhoods and uses attention patterns to generate hypotheses about context-dependent cellular interactions. Retrospective virtual screens support the use of Pop-Corn to prioritize perturbations for experimental follow-up according to their predicted effects on cell-state composition.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.