Limitations of differential expression for cell-type marker discovery in single-cell RNA sequencing atlases
Doggett, K.; Pintard, D.; Scheuermann, R. H.; Zhang, Y.
Show abstract
Cell-type marker genes are definitional characteristics of a cell type, and in single-cell RNA sequencing atlases they are commonly nominated through differential expression (DE) testing. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test is the default method for marker gene discovery in Seurat and a recommended method in Scanpy, two widely used computational software packages for scRNA-seq analysis. Structurally, Wilcoxon's standardized statistic grows with sample size at a fixed underlying effect, meaning computed rankings across clusters of unequal size are incomparable. We quantified this effect across three atlas datasets - lung, kidney, and brain. Mean Wilcoxon score scaled with log cluster size at Pearson correlation r = 0.90-0.95 in each organ. In contrast, a classification-based comparator, NS-Forest, showed low correlation with cluster size (r = 0.10-0.28). This DE-cluster size relationship remained essentially unchanged after controlling for classification performance through partial correlation, decayed monotonically under cluster size downsampling, and was reproduced in simulation with marker quality fixed. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test can be transformed into a rank-based effect size by normalizing by the target-background pair count, removing the positive size dependence. However, this effect size nominates an identical set of candidate genes as the original statistic, indicating the cluster size dependence and poor specificity of DE nominated genes are separate problems. Genes nominated under default settings were substantially less specific to their target clusters, with median on-target fractions of 0.204 (lung), 0.166 (kidney), and 0.083 (brain), compared to NS-Forest's marker genes (0.580, 0.687, 0.364), revealing the relatively poor specificity that highly scoring DE genes exhibit.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Integration of Mouse and Human Single-cell RNA Sequencing Infers Spatial Cell-type Composition in Human Brains 92%
- Expanding canonical cortical cell type markers in the era of single-cell transcriptomics 91%
- High-throughput gene expression analysis with TempO-LINC sensitively resolves complex brain, lung and kidney heterogeneity at single-cell resolution 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Feature Selection and Dimension Reduction for Single Cell RNA-Seq based on a Multinomial Model 91%
- Biology-inspired data-driven quality control for scientific discovery in single-cell transcriptomics 91%
- omnideconv: a unifying framework for using and benchmarking single-cell-informed deconvolution of bulk RNA-seq data 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- LIMPACAT : Multi-Omics Attention Transformer for Immune Prediction in Liver Cancer Using Whole-Slide Imaging 89%
- scAEGAN: Unification of Single-Cell Genomics Data by Adversarial Learning of Latent Space Correspondences 89%
- Evaluation of critical data processing steps for reliable prediction of gene co-expression from large collections of RNA-seq data 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- CSRefiner: A lightweight framework for fine-tuning cell segmentation models with small datasets 90%
- Sincast: a computational framework to predict cell identities in single cell transcriptomes using bulk atlases as references 90%
- FIRM: Flexible Integration of single-cell RNA-sequencing data for large-scale Multi-tissue cell atlas datasets 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.