Back

Asymmetric assembly of congested contiguous stereocenters via photobiocatalytic three-component radical coupling

Hu, Q.; Zheng, C.-X.; Mai, B. K.; Liu, P.; Yang, Y.

2026-09-28 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.09.25.754468 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Despite rapid advances in new-to-nature biocatalysis, trimolecular enzymatic reactions that generate previously inaccessible molecular entities, particularly those bearing well-defined, congested stereochemical dyads, remain exceedingly rare. Here, we report a novel diastereo- and enantioselective photobiocatalytic three-component radical coupling unknown in both organic chemistry and enzymology, enabled by cooperative catalysis employing an evolved pyridoxal biocatalyst and a transition-metal photosensitizer. Directed evolution using high-throughput photobiocatalysis furnished two threonine aldolase variants, enabling the stereoselective assembly of contiguous tri- and tetrasubstituted stereocenters as well as vicinal tetrasubstituted stereocenters, which were long regarded as a challenging goal for stereoselective radical chemistry and asymmetric catalysis. Furthermore, a variety of radical precursors, including alpha-iodoesters, alpha-iodoamides, alpha-iodoketones, and alpha-iodonitriles, could be transformed into structurally diverse, densely substituted non-canonical amino acid derivatives via C-H functionalization with excellent stereocontrol. Leveraging the broad substrate compatibility of engineered pyridoxal biocatalysts, combinatorial biocatalysis was achieved by simultaneously varying all three coupling partners, delivering products with a 98% success rate. Collectively, this diversity-generating multicomponent photobiocatalytic radical coupling afforded a powerful strategy for addressing long-standing challenges in asymmetric catalysis while enabling access to valuable stereochemically complex small molecules with applications in medicinal chemistry.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.