Back

Change-point oddball elicits pupil-linked signatures of Bayesian belief updating

Kopel, L.; Hoomans, J. M.; van Gastel, E.; Tijhuis, J. V.; van de Graaf, M.; Shafik, M.; Matthijsse, S.; Murphy, P. R.; van Gaal, S.; Suzuki, M.; de Gee, J. W.

2026-10-01 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.09.25.754382 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The auditory oddball protocol is widely used to study neural responses to unexpected events. In conventional designs, however, stimulus statistics are stationary: deviants do not indicate environmental change and therefore should not drive learning. Here, we introduce change-point oddball, a passive, no-report protocol in which the standard-oddball mapping reverses at unpredictable change points, requiring inference over latent environmental states. We measured pupil-linked arousal in three human cohorts. Pupil responses were larger for state-specific oddballs than standards, decayed across newly established standards after state changes, and scaled with model-derived change-point probability. A many-standards control experiment implicated a prediction-based rather than repetition-based mechanism. Finally, within participants, stronger pupil encoding of change-point probability during the passive task was associated with greater change-point-sensitive belief updating in a separate active navigation task. Thus, passive change-point oddball preserves core signatures of adaptive belief updating, enabling cross-species and clinical investigations.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.