Rationalizing the application of spatial capture-recapture versus space-to-event models for monitoring populations of an endangered social carnivore
Ganguly, D.; Sharma, A. D.; Ramakrishnan, U.; Srivathsa, A.
Show abstract
Reliable estimates of population size are fundamental to understanding wildlife population status and informing conservation. Obtaining such estimates remains challenging for unmarked species, particularly in tropical countries where logistical and financial constraints limit intensive monitoring. The endangered dhole (Cuon alpinus), a highly social canid without natural markings, is one such species for which robust population estimates remain scarce. We estimated dhole density in the Valparai plateau, a human-dominated agroforest-forest mosaic in India's Western Ghats. We compared Spatially Explicit Capture-Recapture (SECR) models based on individual identification from fecal DNA and Space-to-Event (STE) models based on camera-trap detections. We additionally applied both approaches to individually identifiable leopards (Panthera pardus) to cross-validate STE versus SECR estimates. SECR estimated dhole density at 22 individuals per 100 sq.km, with STE estimates varying substantially depending on how the camera viewshed area was defined. STE estimates based on post hoc viewshed measurements, particularly after reducing the viewshed by 10%, were comparable to SECR estimates. In contrast, STE underestimated leopard density relative to SECR (7 versus 12 per 100 sq.km), although uncertainty intervals overlapped. Ecologically, our results indicate that human-use agroforest mosaics can support dhole densities comparable to, or exceeding, those reported from several Protected Areas, highlighting their potential importance for dhole conservation. More broadly, we argue that STE models may offer a practical and relatively inexpensive approach for baseline monitoring of dholes from camera-trap surveys, but their reliability depends strongly on accurate characterization of the effective viewshed and may vary across species and landscapes.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Addressing multiple sources of uncertainty in the estimation of parrot abundance from roost counts: a case study with the Vinaceous-breasted Parrot (Amazona vinacea) 94%
- Guidelines for evaluating the success of large carnivore reintroductions 94%
- Terrain ruggedness and human activities influence the distribution of Grauer's gorillas (Gorilla beringei graueri) and eastern chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) in the Tayna Nature Reserve, Democratic Republic of Congo 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reserve size and anthropogenic disturbance affect the density of an African leopard (Panthera pardus) meta-population 95%
- Population size, density, and ranging behaviour in a key leopard population in the Western Cape, South Africa 94%
- Density responses of lesser-studied carnivores to habitat and management strategies in southern Tanzanias Ruaha-Rungwa landscape 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Between a rock and a hard place: Effects of land-use change on rock-dwelling animals of lateritic plateaus in the northern Western Ghats 92%
- Integrating spatial, phylogenetic, and threat assessment data from frogs and lizards to identify areas for conservation priorities in Peninsular Malaysia 91%
- Abundance estimation from genetic mark-recapture data when not all sites are sampled: an example with the bowhead whale 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Population density modeling of mixed polymorphic phenotypes: an application of spatial mark-resight models 95%
- Comparative efficiency of eDNA, camera traps and scat surveys to detect a semi-aquatic mammal across multiple catchments 94%
- Effects of land use change and elevation on endemic shrub frogs in a biodiversity hotspot 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.