Back

Agentic transcranial functional ultrasound imaging: @fUS

CHEN, Z.; Yuan, Z.; Lu, Z.; Li, N.; Fu, C.; Sun, L.; Yao, H.; Liu, H.; Xian, Q.; Wang, T.; Li, W.; Liang, Z.; Li, B.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Y.; Wang, H.; Bian, W.-j.; Liu, X.; Chen, Y.; Li, B.; SUN, L.; Wang, Y.; Qiu, Z.

2026-09-28 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.09.25.752961 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Functional ultrasound (fUS) imaging provides deep, wide-field access to brain function, but instrument cost and complex acquisition and analysis workflows restrict its wider adoption. Here we introduce @fUS, an agentic transcranial imaging platform with an open architecture that integrates purpose-built hardware with executable experimental skills and persistent structured memory. The system combines 128-channel, 16-bit acquisition at 125 MHz with GPU-based processing and enables functional imaging through the intact scalp and skull of mice, with approximately 100-m spatial resolution and 10-Hz temporal sampling, providing a basis for longitudinal studies without cranial-window surgery. Its agent connects scientific objectives to experimental design, direct instrument control and data analysis, retaining context across interactions and supporting inspectable workflows through text and hands-free voice control. Neuroscience trainees with limited engineering experience independently configured the system within 30 min. Agent-assisted exploration of whisker-stimulation datasets revealed low-frequency vascular changes beyond conventional response mapping, supported by complementary two-photon measurements of single-vessel diameter. By combining transcranial imaging with accessible instrument control and analysis, @fUS provides a foundation for wider adoption and larger, more diverse neuroscience datasets. More broadly, it offers a framework for scientific instruments in which measurement, computation and experimental reasoning are developed as parts of the same system.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.