Limit-pushing overexpression reveals constraints on protein abundance
Namba, S.; Nishida, Y.; Boone, C.; Andrews, B.; Moriya, H.
Show abstract
Proteins are often classified as toxic or non-toxic without measuring the abundance reached, leaving constraints on tolerable protein abundance unresolved. We established a limit-pushing approach in Saccharomyces cerevisiae combining strong inducible expression with gTOW-mediated high-copy selection to counteract copy-number compensation while measuring protein abundance and growth. Nearly all of approximately 80 chromosome I proteins severely inhibited growth or reduced viability at sufficiently high abundance. We established IE50, the expression level associated with a 50% reduction in growth rate, to quantify their widely varying overexpression tolerance. IE50 was positively associated with predicted structural order and cytoplasmic localization propensity and negatively associated with sulphur content. Single-cell imaging linked higher tolerance to proteins remaining cytoplasmic without becoming aggregation-positive and revealed abundance-dependent changes in localization and organelle morphology. At extreme abundance, Fun12, Nup60, and Pex22 generated distinct large-scale intracellular states through specific sequence regions. These findings establish overexpression toxicity as a quantitative property linked to protein characteristics and reveal both constraints on tolerable abundance and sequence-dependent capacities for intracellular organization.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring endocytic compartment morphology with systematic genetics and single cell image analysis 94%
- Dormancy-to-death transition in yeast spores occurs due to gradual loss of gene-expressing ability 93%
- PIFiA: Self-supervised Approach for Protein Functional Annotation from Single-Cell Imaging Data 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.