Motor learning refines premotor cortical constraint during skilled forelimb behavior
Chen, D.; Jia, F.; Huang, Q.; Guo, Y.; Li, Y.
Show abstract
Motor learning transforms variable actions into reliable skilled behavior, but how premotor cortex supports this transformation remains unclear. We longitudinally recorded bilateral local field potentials and single-unit activity from the rat rostral forelimb area while animals acquired a single-pellet retrieval task. Here, we show that improved skill was accompanied by reduced, rather than increased, task-related premotor recruitment. Despite this attenuation, firing remained dominated by suppression around pellet retrieval, and stronger pre-retrieval suppression was associated with greater odds of successful performance. Population neural state analysis further showed that successful actions were most strongly coupled to sustained pre-retrieval engagement early in learning, whereas later success occurred with less population-level engagement. These findings reveal premotor cortical constraint as a population-level process that is progressively refined as motor learning transforms variable actions into reliable skilled behavior.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Graded and bidirectional control of real-time reach kinematics by the cerebellum 96%
- Inhibitory and excitatory populations in parietal cortex are equally selective for decision outcome in both novices and experts 96%
- Mesoscale cortical dynamics reflect the interaction of sensory evidence and temporal expectation during perceptual decision-making 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Tactile enrichment drives emergence of functional columns and improves sensory coding in L2/3 of mouse S1 95%
- Dynamical structure of cortical taste responses revealed by precisely-timed optogenetic perturbation 95%
- Coding of latent variables in sensory, parietal, and frontal cortices during virtual closed-loop navigation 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.