VRPTR prediction of individual language activation and uncertainty from resting state fMRI
Di Giovanni, D. A.; Collins, D. L.
Show abstract
Resting-state connectivity can predict task-evoked fMRI activation, but correspondence with an individual task map may partly reflect a shared population pattern. We evaluated the Variational Resting-state-to-Task Prediction TransformeR (VRPTR), a three-dimensional encoder-decoder combining a compressed Transformer bottleneck, variational latent sampling, and multiscale skip connections. Models were trained in 360 healthy adults from the WU-Minn Human Connectome Project and evaluated in 40 held-out participants from the same dataset for the story-versus-math language contrast. VRPTR achieved mean voxel-map Pearson r=0.642 and Dice AUC=0.519, exceeding compact volumetric BrainSurfCNN-like and SWIFUN-like comparators by {Delta}r=0.0376 and 0.0335, respectively. A template fixed from the 360 training maps yielded residual correlation 0.364; VRPTR improved correlation but not mean absolute or root mean squared error over this template. A matched factorial ablation associated Transformer processing with improved map correlation ({Delta}r=0.0168); the variational main effect did not survive multiple-comparison correction. Component swaps indicated that subject-specific activation patterns depended more on multiscale skip features than on the bottleneck representation. Latent sampling produced a modest association between posterior standard deviation and voxelwise absolute error (mean Spearman {rho}=0.091). Raw 95% intervals covered only 4.7% of observed values. Five-fold calibration within the held-out cohort increased coverage to 94.8%, and spatially varying uncertainty modestly improved probabilistic scores over a constant-width model. Uncertainty also increased under input degradation. These findings support the contribution of Transformer processing to language-map prediction and distinguish it from subject-specific spatial conditioning and relative uncertainty estimation. Independent validation of calibrated uncertainty and evaluation in clinical cohorts remain necessary.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.